Medical Malpractice Lawyer in Istanbul, Turkey

Medical Malpractice Law in Turkey

Medical malpractice in Turkey is not governed by one standalone "medical malpractice law." Depending on the circumstances, a dispute can involve several areas of Turkish legislation, professional rules and patient-rights provisions.

​

The legal framework may include the Turkish Code of Obligations, Turkish Code of Civil Procedure, Turkish Penal Code, Health Services Basic Law, the Patient Rights Regulation, legislation governing healthcare professionals and institutions, administrative law and personal-data protection rules.

 

The official Turkish legislation database is an important source for checking the current text of applicable legislation.

​

The Ministry of Health's Patient Rights and Medical Social Services Department also publishes patient-rights legislation, guidance and information concerning healthcare services.

 

The legal route depends on the facts. A claim involving a private hospital can raise different issues from a claim involving a public hospital. Likewise, a compensation claim is different from a criminal complaint.

​

What Is Medical Malpractice?

In everyday language, people often use "medical malpractice" to describe any treatment that goes wrong. Legally, however, the question is more specific.

​

The issue may be whether a healthcare professional or institution failed to act in accordance with the level of professional care required in the circumstances and whether that failure caused legally recognisable damage.

 

A potential case may therefore involve questions such as:

​

• Was the patient's condition properly assessed?

• Was an appropriate diagnosis made?

• Were necessary tests considered?

• Was treatment appropriate in the circumstances?

• Was the patient adequately monitored?

• Was the patient given relevant information about the proposed intervention?

• Was an avoidable error made during treatment or surgery?

• Was appropriate action taken when the patient's condition changed?

• Did the alleged mistake actually cause the injury?

• Who was legally responsible for the treatment?

 

These questions cannot usually be answered from the final outcome alone.

​

Medical Malpractice, Medical Error and Complication

Understanding the difference between an error, complication and malpractice is one of the first steps in evaluating a healthcare dispute.

​

What Is a Medical Complication?

A complication can occur even where a healthcare professional has acted appropriately.

​

Every medical intervention carries some level of risk. Surgery, anaesthesia, medication, childbirth and other procedures can result in complications despite reasonable care.

 

The existence of a complication does not, by itself, prove negligence.

​

What Is a Medical Error?

A medical error can involve an incorrect decision, omission, communication problem or procedural mistake.

​

But an error does not automatically answer the legal question of liability. The circumstances in which it occurred and its consequences still have to be assessed.

​

When Can an Error Become Medical Malpractice?

A potential malpractice case may arise where the evidence establishes a legally relevant departure from the expected standard of care and a causal connection between that conduct and the patient's injury.

​

That is why an experienced lawyer will normally avoid making a conclusion based simply on the fact that treatment was unsuccessful.

​

Patient Rights Under Turkish Law

Patient rights are an important part of Turkish healthcare law.

​

The Patient Rights Regulation applies to official and private healthcare institutions and addresses the rights of people receiving healthcare services. The official text of the Patient Rights Regulation provides the current framework published by the Ministry of Health.

​

The regulation addresses matters including:

​

• access to healthcare;

• equality and fairness in healthcare;

• obtaining information;

• choosing or changing a healthcare institution or professional where applicable;

• receiving diagnosis, treatment and care consistent with medical requirements;

• protection against medically unnecessary interventions;

• privacy;

• consent;

• medical records and information;

• religious and personal considerations in appropriate circumstances; and

• legal protection when patient rights are violated.

 

The Ministry of Health's Patient Rights Department also provides information about patient-rights applications, legislation and related healthcare services.

​

The Right to Information

Information is particularly important in medical disputes.

​

A patient may need to understand the nature of a proposed intervention, its consequences, relevant risks and available alternatives before deciding whether to proceed.

 

A consent form is therefore only one part of the evidence.

 

In a disputed case, lawyers may examine:

​

• what the patient was told;

• when the information was provided;

• whether the information was understandable;

• what risks were discussed;

• whether alternatives were explained;

• what the medical records say;

• whether the patient's questions were documented; and

• whether the actual procedure differed from what had been explained.

 

The Patient Rights Regulation contains provisions concerning patients' rights to information and consent.

​

Informed Consent and Medical Malpractice

A patient's signature on a consent form does not necessarily mean that every subsequent medical error is legally protected.

​

Consent concerns the patient's agreement to medical intervention. It does not give a healthcare provider unlimited permission to provide negligent treatment.

 

For example, a patient may have agreed to surgery while still having a potential claim if the evidence later shows that the procedure was performed negligently.

 

Conversely, a known medical risk that was properly explained and occurred despite appropriate care may not amount to malpractice.

 

The precise circumstances are therefore critical.

​

Common Medical Malpractice Claims in Turkey

Medical malpractice disputes can arise in many different medical settings.

​

Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis

A delayed or incorrect diagnosis can sometimes cause additional harm.

​

A legal assessment may consider:

​

• the patient's symptoms;

• the patient's medical history;

• examinations performed;

• tests available at the relevant time;

• test results;

• referrals;

• diagnoses considered;

• treatment decisions;

• the timing of intervention; and

• whether an earlier diagnosis would probably have changed the outcome.

 

A diagnosis that later proves incorrect is not automatically negligent. The question is whether the decision was reasonable based on the information available to the healthcare professional at the time.

​

Surgical Errors

Surgical disputes can involve technically complex questions.

​

Potential issues may include:

​

• wrong-site surgery;

• damage to an organ, nerve or blood vessel;

• retained surgical material;

• incorrect surgical technique;

• avoidable postoperative complications;

• inadequate monitoring;

• failure to respond to a developing complication; or

• another departure from appropriate surgical practice.

 

Medical records, operative reports and expert evidence can be especially important in these cases.

​

Medication Errors

Medication-related disputes may involve:

​

• the wrong medicine;

• an incorrect dose;

• failure to consider an allergy;

• an avoidable drug interaction;

• inappropriate prescribing;

• inadequate instructions; or

• inadequate monitoring.

 

The patient's medical history and the information available to the healthcare provider at the time may be central to the assessment.

​

Anesthesia-Related Injuries

Anesthesia cases can involve questions concerning:

​

• preoperative assessment;

• medication;

• monitoring;

• airway management;

• patient history;

• intraoperative events; and

• postoperative observation.

 

Because these cases can involve highly technical medical issues, specialist evidence may be necessary.

​

Birth and Obstetric Malpractice

Pregnancy and childbirth cases may involve serious consequences for both mother and child.

​

Potential issues include:

​

• inadequate fetal monitoring;

• failure to recognize fetal distress;

• delayed intervention;

• inappropriate delivery decisions;

• delayed Caesarean section;

• medication errors;

• inadequate maternal monitoring; or

• failure to respond appropriately to an emergency.

 

The circumstances must be assessed against the medical information available at the relevant time.

​

Dental Malpractice

Dental treatment can also give rise to professional-liability disputes.

​

Examples may include allegations concerning:

​

• incorrect diagnosis;

• inappropriate extraction;

• nerve injury;

• implant complications;

• inadequate treatment planning;

• incorrect treatment; or

• inadequate information before a procedure.

 

Again, an undesirable result does not automatically establish negligence.

​

Cosmetic and Aesthetic Treatment

Cosmetic medicine and surgery can create particular disputes because patients may have specific expectations about the result.

​

Potential cases may involve:

​

• inadequate information about material risks;

• treatment that differed from what was agreed;

• negligent surgical technique;

• avoidable injury;

• inadequate follow-up; or

• misleading representations concerning the treatment.

 

The legal assessment should distinguish dissatisfaction with a result from an objectively supportable allegation of professional fault.

​

Medical Malpractice in Private Hospitals

Private healthcare disputes can involve contractual and professional-liability questions.

​

Depending on the circumstances, responsibility may potentially involve:

​

• the treating physician;

• a surgeon or other healthcare professional;

• the private hospital;

• a medical center;

• another healthcare company; or

• more than one party.

 

The treatment agreement, medical records, employment or service arrangements and the actual conduct of the parties may all be relevant.

 

A patient should therefore avoid assuming that the individual doctor is automatically the only legally responsible party.

​

Medical Malpractice in Public Hospitals

Cases involving public hospitals can require a different legal approach.

Where the alleged harm arises from a public healthcare service, the dispute may involve administrative liability and service fault, rather than following exactly the same route as a private healthcare claim.

​

The appropriate authority, procedure, deadline and evidentiary requirements can therefore be different.

​

The Ministry of Health provides official information concerning Turkey's public healthcare system, while the official legislation database should be consulted for the legislation governing the relevant procedure.

​

A potential claim involving a public hospital should be assessed promptly because procedural requirements can be important.

​

Can a Patient Sue a Doctor in Turkey?

Potentially, yes, but the answer depends on the circumstances.

​

A lawyer may need to establish:

​

1. What treatment relationship existed?

2. Who provided the healthcare service?

3. What happened during treatment?

4. Was there a legally relevant fault?

5. Did that fault cause the alleged injury?

6. What damage resulted?

7. Which legal procedure applies?

8. Has the applicable limitation or procedural period expired?

 

The identity of the correct defendant is particularly important.

 

In some matters, the hospital or healthcare institution may need to be included. In others, the physician's individual conduct may be central. Some cases may involve several potentially responsible parties.

​

Who Can Be Held Responsible for Medical Malpractice?

Depending on the facts, potential responsibility may concern:

​

• physicians;

• surgeons;

• dentists;

• anesthesiologists;

• nurses or other healthcare professionals;

• private hospitals;

• clinics;

• medical centers;

• healthcare companies; or

• public healthcare administrations.

 

The legal relationship between the patient and each party should be examined before a claim is brought.

​

How Is Medical Malpractice Proven?

Medical malpractice cases are often evidence-heavy.

​

It is generally not enough to say, "The treatment went wrong."

 

The evidence must help answer the legal and medical questions surrounding the dispute.

​

Medical Records

Important records may include:

​

• patient files;

• examination notes;

• laboratory results;

• imaging;

• prescriptions;

• surgical reports;

• anesthesia records;

• nursing records;

• discharge summaries;

• consent forms;

• invoices;

• referral records;

• follow-up records; and

• communications with the healthcare provider.

 

Patients should keep copies of their medical documents and preserve them in their original form.

​

Expert Evidence

Medical questions can go beyond ordinary legal knowledge.

​

The Turkish Code of Civil Procedure provides for expert examination where specialist or technical knowledge is required. The official legislation text of the Code of Civil Procedure can be consulted through Turkey's legislation database.

 

In practice, expert medical assessment can be central to questions such as:

​

• whether treatment was appropriate;

• whether a particular intervention should have been performed;

• whether a medical error occurred;

• whether an injury was an unavoidable complication; and

• whether the alleged error caused the damage.

​

Causation

Causation is often one of the most difficult parts of a medical malpractice case.

​

It may be necessary to determine whether the alleged mistake actually caused the injury or whether the outcome would have occurred because of the patient's underlying medical condition.

​

For example, if a patient already suffered from a serious disease before treatment, the legal assessment may need to distinguish the consequences of the underlying disease from additional harm allegedly caused by negligent treatment.

​

What Evidence Should Be Preserved?

A patient considering a possible claim should preserve relevant material rather than relying on memory.

​

Useful evidence can include:

​

• hospital records;

• medical reports;

• test results;

• scans and imaging;

• prescriptions;

• medication records;

• consent forms;

• photographs;

• invoices;

• payment records;

• appointment records;

• correspondence;

• emails;

• messages;

• records from subsequent doctors;

• evidence of additional treatment;

• evidence of lost income; and

• documents relating to disability or long-term impairment.

 

If another doctor later treats the patient, records from that treatment may also become relevant.

​

Health Data and Patient Confidentiality

Medical malpractice cases necessarily involve sensitive personal information.

​

Under Turkish data-protection law, health information is special-category personal data and receives enhanced protection.

​

The Personal Data Protection Authority (KVKK) explains the legal status and protection of special-category personal data, including health information.

​

This becomes relevant when medical information is:

​

• obtained from a hospital;

• shared with a lawyer;

• reviewed by medical experts;

• submitted to a court;

• provided to another healthcare provider; or

• disclosed during a complaint or legal proceeding.

 

The KVKK guidance on special-category personal data is a useful official reference when considering how health information is processed and protected.

​

Can a Patient Request Medical Records?

Medical records can be highly important in a potential malpractice case.

​

Patients may have rights concerning information about their health and treatment under Turkish patient-rights rules. The Ministry of Health's Patient Rights resources provide official information about these rights and related procedures.

 

If obtaining the necessary records becomes difficult, legal advice can help determine the appropriate next step.

 

A patient should not wait until litigation begins before thinking about evidence preservation.

​

Complaining About a Doctor or Hospital in Turkey

A patient who believes their rights have been violated may have several possible avenues.

​

Depending on the circumstances, these may include:

​

• the healthcare institution's patient-rights unit;

• the Ministry of Health;

• administrative complaint mechanisms;

• professional bodies;

• law-enforcement authorities; or

• judicial proceedings.

 

The Ministry of Health's Patient Rights and Medical Social Services Department provides information concerning patient-rights applications and related mechanisms.

 

The existence of a complaint procedure does not necessarily mean that a compensation claim has also been filed. These processes can have different purposes.

​

SABİM and Patient Complaints

Turkey's Ministry of Health operates SABİM (184) as an official communication channel for health-related applications and complaints.

​

Information concerning patient-rights applications and the Ministry's relevant systems can be found through the Ministry of Health and its Patient Rights Department.

 

A complaint can be useful in documenting a concern, but it should not automatically be treated as a substitute for obtaining advice about compensation, litigation or other legal remedies.

​

Can Medical Malpractice Result in Criminal Liability?

In some circumstances, yes.

​

A medical dispute can potentially have a criminal dimension where the facts satisfy the elements of an offence under Turkish criminal law.

 

For example, Article 89 of the Turkish Penal Code regulates negligent injury and addresses circumstances in which negligent conduct causes bodily pain or impairment of health or perception.

 

The current legislation should be checked through the official Turkish Penal Code text.

 

Criminal responsibility is not established merely because a patient suffered an adverse medical outcome. The facts must be assessed under the relevant criminal-law provisions.

​

Civil Compensation and Criminal Proceedings

A compensation claim and a criminal complaint serve different purposes.

​

Compensation Proceedings

The purpose is to seek legally recoverable compensation for damage.

​

Depending on the circumstances, this may include material and non-material damages.

​

Criminal Proceedings

A criminal complaint asks the competent authorities to investigate whether the conduct may constitute a criminal offence.

​

Administrative Proceedings

Where public healthcare services are involved, administrative-law remedies may need to be considered.

​

Patient-Rights Complaints

A patient-rights application can address concerns about the patient's treatment and rights within the healthcare system.

​

These routes can sometimes overlap, but they should not be confused with one another.

​

What Compensation Can Be Claimed for Medical Malpractice?

The recoverable damages depend on the facts and applicable legal basis.

​

Material Damages

Depending on the circumstances, material losses may include legally recoverable expenses such as:

​

• additional treatment costs;

• rehabilitation;

• medication;

• necessary care;

• future medical expenses;

• loss of earnings;

• reduced earning capacity; and

• other provable financial losses.

 

The amount should be supported by evidence wherever possible.

​

Non-Material Damages

Serious injury can affect a person's physical integrity, dignity and personal life.

Turkish law recognises circumstances in which non-material damages may be sought.

​

The amount is not determined simply by applying a fixed price to an injury. The court may consider the nature and seriousness of the harm and the circumstances of the individual case.

​

How Are Damages Calculated?

There is no universal medical malpractice compensation table that can reliably predict the amount a patient will receive.

​

The assessment may depend on:

​

• the nature of the injury;

• permanence of the impairment;

• treatment expenses;

• future medical needs;

• age and circumstances of the injured person;

• loss of income;

• reduction in earning capacity;

• care requirements;

• degree of fault;

• expert findings; and

• other legally relevant factors.

 

A lawyer should therefore be cautious about promising a particular compensation amount before the medical and financial evidence has been examined.

​

Limitation Periods in Turkish Medical Malpractice Cases

Time limits require careful attention.

​

There is no single limitation period that applies identically to every medical malpractice dispute in Turkey.

 

The applicable period can depend on matters such as:

​

• the legal nature of the claim;

• whether the healthcare provider is public or private;

• whether the claim is based on contract, tort or another legal relationship;

• when the damage became known;

• when the responsible party became known;

• whether criminal conduct is alleged;

• the nature of the injury; and

• special statutory rules.

 

Claims against public authorities can involve separate administrative procedures and deadlines.

 

For this reason, a patient should not rely on a general statement such as "medical malpractice claims have X years."

 

A Turkish lawyer should review the individual circumstances and identify the relevant deadlines before deciding how to proceed.

​

What Should You Do If You Suspect Medical Malpractice?

The first priority should always be appropriate medical care.

​

If you believe that something went wrong during treatment, the following steps can help preserve your legal position.

​

1. Continue Necessary Medical Treatment

Do not delay necessary treatment because of a potential legal claim.

Your health comes first.

​

2. Obtain Your Medical Documents

Request copies of relevant medical records, reports, imaging, prescriptions and treatment documentation.

​

3. Keep a Chronology

Write down important dates while events are still fresh in your memory:

​

• consultations;

• tests;

• treatment;

• surgery;

• discharge;

• complications;

• follow-up visits; and

• subsequent treatment.

​

4. Preserve Financial Evidence

Keep invoices, receipts, payment records and evidence of income loss where relevant.

​

5. Preserve Communications

Keep correspondence with the hospital, doctor, clinic, insurer or medical intermediary.

​

6. Avoid Altering Original Records

Keep original documents and make copies for legal or medical use.

​

7. Seek Legal Advice Promptly

Because different claims can have different procedural requirements and limitation periods, early legal assessment can be important.

​

Medical Malpractice and Foreign Patients in Istanbul

Istanbul is an international healthcare destination, and many foreign nationals travel to Turkey for medical treatment.

​

Foreign patients may seek treatment for:

​

• cosmetic surgery;

• dental procedures;

• fertility treatment;

• orthopaedic surgery;

• hair transplantation;

• bariatric procedures;

• eye treatment;

• other elective procedures; or

• general medical care.

 

A dispute can become more complicated where the patient lives outside Turkey or where several countries are involved.

 

Questions may arise concerning:

​

• the treatment agreement;

• the Turkish healthcare provider;

• a medical tourism intermediary;

• the applicable law;

• jurisdiction;

• translation of medical documents;

• insurance;

• international payments;

• evidence located abroad; and

• communication with foreign healthcare providers.

 

A foreign patient's nationality does not by itself determine the applicable legal procedure.

​

Medical Tourism and Malpractice Claims

A medical tourism case may involve more than one business or professional.

For example, a patient might have communicated with an overseas agency, a Turkish medical-tourism company, a hospital and an individual physician.

​

The lawyer may therefore need to identify:

​

• who sold the treatment;

• who arranged the treatment;

• who performed the treatment;

• who received the payment;

• who employed or contracted with the healthcare professional; and

• who may legally be responsible for the resulting damage.

 

The documents surrounding the treatment can be very important in answering these questions.

​

Medical Malpractice After Cosmetic Surgery in Turkey

Cosmetic and aesthetic procedures deserve particular care in legal analysis.

​

A patient may be disappointed with the result, but dissatisfaction alone does not establish malpractice.

 

The assessment may involve:

​

• what procedure was agreed;

• what outcome was represented;

• what risks were explained;

• what the consent documents state;

• whether the procedure was performed appropriately;

• whether a recognised complication occurred;

• whether follow-up care was adequate; and

• what injury actually resulted.

 

Photographs taken before and after treatment, medical records and communications with the clinic can be particularly useful.

​

Medical Malpractice After Dental Treatment

Dental disputes can involve both medical and contractual questions.

​

Potential allegations can concern:

​

• incorrect diagnosis;

• inappropriate treatment;

• nerve injury;

• implant complications;

• extraction errors;

• inadequate planning;

• failure to identify an underlying condition; or

• insufficient information about material risks.

 

The patient's pre-treatment condition and subsequent treatment records may be particularly important.

​

Birth Injury and Medical Malpractice

Birth-injury cases can be among the most sensitive healthcare disputes.

​

They may involve questions concerning:

​

• prenatal care;

• monitoring during labour;

• fetal distress;

• timing of intervention;

• emergency response;

• Caesarean delivery;

• neonatal care; and

• the consequences of an alleged delay or error.

 

These cases often require detailed medical evidence and careful assessment of causation.

 

Where a child has suffered a serious injury, the legal analysis may also need to consider long-term care, rehabilitation, future expenses and the child's future needs.

​

Medical Malpractice and Patient Privacy

Patients should be careful when discussing a dispute publicly.

​

Posting medical records, photographs, names or accusations on social media can create separate privacy, data-protection or reputational issues.

 

The Turkish Personal Data Protection Authority provides official information concerning personal data and special-category data.

 

Legal proceedings should generally be handled through appropriate channels rather than through public accusations.

​

Medical Malpractice Mediation in Turkey

Not every healthcare dispute has to end with a lengthy court case.

​

Depending on the legal nature of the dispute and the applicable procedural rules, the parties may consider negotiation or mediation.

 

A negotiated resolution can sometimes address:

​

• compensation;

• payment arrangements;

• treatment-related costs;

• settlement terms;

• confidentiality where legally permissible; and

• other issues that can lawfully be resolved between the parties.

 

Mediation is not automatically the right choice. It should be considered after the evidence and legal position have been assessed.

 

Information about Turkey's mediation framework can be obtained through the Ministry of Justice's Mediation Department.

​

What Does a Medical Malpractice Lawyer in Istanbul Do?

A medical malpractice lawyer does more than prepare a lawsuit.

​

A careful legal assessment may begin with understanding what happened and determining whether the available evidence supports a legal claim.

 

Our work may include:

​

Initial Case Assessment

We review the basic facts and identify the principal medical and legal questions.

​

Medical Record Review

We organise the available records and construct a clear chronology of treatment.

​

Identification of Potentially Responsible Parties

We examine the relationship between the patient, physician, hospital, clinic and other relevant parties.

​

Evidence Assessment

We identify documents, expert evidence and other material that may be relevant to liability, causation and damages.

​

Compensation Claims

Where the evidence supports a claim, we assist with pursuing legally recoverable material and non-material damages.

​

Negotiation

Where appropriate, we communicate with the healthcare provider, hospital, insurer or opposing legal representatives to explore a negotiated resolution.

​

Mediation

Where mediation is available and suitable, we represent the client during the process.

​

Administrative Proceedings

Where a public healthcare institution is involved, we assess the appropriate administrative-law procedure.

​

Criminal Complaints

Where the facts potentially indicate a criminal offence, we advise on the relevant criminal procedure.

​

Court Proceedings

Where litigation is necessary, we represent clients before the competent Turkish courts.

​

Medical Malpractice Claims Require Both Legal and Medical Analysis

A medical malpractice dispute sits at the intersection of medicine and law.

A lawyer can explain the legal consequences, but technical medical questions often require specialist assessment.

​

For example, determining whether a particular diagnostic test should have been ordered may require medical expertise. So may determining whether an injury was a foreseeable complication or the result of a preventable error.

 

That is why the evidence should be approached carefully rather than starting with the assumption that the doctor or hospital must be responsible simply because the outcome was serious.

​

Why the Medical Timeline Matters

The sequence of events can be as important as the individual medical decisions.

​

A lawyer may need to reconstruct:

 

symptoms → consultation → examination → diagnosis → tests → treatment → deterioration → intervention → discharge → follow-up → subsequent treatment

 

A delay of several hours, days or weeks can sometimes have legal significance. In another case, the same delay may have made no difference to the ultimate outcome.

 

The medical timeline helps separate these possibilities.

​

Why Causation Can Be Difficult

Suppose a patient suffers a serious injury after treatment.

​

There may be several possible explanations:

​

• the underlying illness;

• a recognized complication;

• an unavoidable medical risk;

• negligent treatment;

• delayed diagnosis;

• a later medical event; or

• a combination of factors.

 

The legal claim must therefore connect the alleged fault with the actual damage.

 

This is one reason why a proper medical malpractice assessment cannot be based solely on the patient's final diagnosis.

​

Medical Malpractice Claims Against Healthcare Professionals

A potential claim against an individual healthcare professional may require examination of the professional's role and conduct.

​

Relevant questions may include:

​

• What responsibility did the professional have?

• What information was available?

• What decision did the professional make?

• What alternatives existed?

• What happened after the decision?

• Was the patient appropriately monitored?

• Did the professional respond to complications?

• What injury followed?

 

The answer may differ from the question of whether the hospital itself bears responsibility.

​

Medical Malpractice Claims Against Hospitals

Hospitals may have responsibilities extending beyond the actions of one doctor.

​

Depending on the circumstances, the dispute may concern:

​

• organization of healthcare services;

• staffing;

• equipment;

• patient monitoring;

• record keeping;

• communication;

• emergency response;

• infection control;

• treatment procedures; or

• the actions of personnel working within the institution.

 

The particular legal relationship and facts determine whether and how the hospital can be held responsible.

​

Medical Malpractice and the Turkish Penal Code

Where a medical incident potentially involves criminal negligence, the Turkish Penal Code may become relevant.

​

Article 89 addresses taksirle yaralama, or negligent injury, including circumstances where negligent conduct causes physical pain or impairment of health or perception.

​

The current wording should always be checked against the official Turkish legislation database, particularly because Turkish legislation can be amended over time.

​

A criminal investigation also follows its own procedural rules and should not be confused with a civil compensation claim.

​

Medical Malpractice and Expert Examination

Because medical disputes involve specialized questions, expert examination can play a major role.

​

The Council of Forensic Medicine (Adli Tıp Kurumu) is an important official institution within Turkey's forensic system. Information about its institutional role and services is available through the Adli Tıp Kurumu.

​

Depending on the case and the court's procedural decisions, forensic or other expert assessment may become relevant.

​

The precise evidentiary route depends on the case.

​

Medical Malpractice and the Forensic Medicine Process

Forensic medical assessment may become relevant when a court or competent authority needs specialist evaluation of an injury, disability, cause of death or other medical issue.

​

The purpose is not simply to confirm that the patient was injured.

 

The medical assessment may help establish matters such as:

​

• the nature of the injury;

• permanence;

• causal relationship;

• degree of impairment;

• medical consequences; or

• other technically relevant issues.

 

The legal significance of the medical opinion must then be considered alongside the other evidence.

​

What Documents Should You Provide to a Lawyer?

For an initial assessment, it is helpful to provide whatever documentation is already available.

​

This may include:

​

• medical records;

• hospital discharge documents;

• laboratory results;

• imaging;

• prescriptions;

• surgical reports;

• consent forms;

• invoices;

• photographs;

• correspondence;

• treatment contracts;

• messages with the clinic;

• reports from later doctors;

• evidence of lost income; and

• information about ongoing treatment.

 

You do not need to have a perfectly organized file before seeking legal advice.

Part of the legal work is identifying what is missing and determining how it can properly be obtained.

​

Frequently Asked Questions About Medical Malpractice in Turkey

​

Is every medical mistake malpractice?

No. A medical mistake or adverse outcome does not automatically establish legal liability. The circumstances, professional standard, causation and resulting damage must be examined.

​

Is a medical complication the same as malpractice?

No. A recognized complication can occur despite appropriate medical care. Whether the complication resulted from negligence requires a case-specific assessment.

​

Can I sue a private hospital in Istanbul?

Potentially. The appropriate legal basis and responsible parties depend on the treatment relationship, the conduct involved and the resulting damage.

​

Can I bring a claim against a doctor personally?

Potentially. Whether the doctor, hospital, clinic or another party may be responsible depends on the facts and applicable Turkish law.

​

Can a foreign patient make a malpractice claim in Turkey?

A foreign patient may have legal remedies concerning treatment received in Turkey. The applicable procedure should be assessed based on the treatment, parties involved, jurisdiction and other relevant circumstances.

​

Can I claim compensation for pain and suffering in Turkey?

Turkish law recognizes circumstances in which non-material damages may be awarded. The availability and amount depend on the individual facts and legal basis of the claim.

​

Can medical malpractice lead to criminal proceedings?

Potentially. If the facts satisfy the elements of an offence under Turkish criminal law, a criminal investigation or prosecution may be possible. A serious medical outcome alone does not establish criminal responsibility.

​

Do I need an expert medical opinion?

Medical expert evidence may be important because questions about diagnosis, treatment, professional standards and causation can require specialized knowledge.

​

How long do medical malpractice cases take in Turkey?

There is no fixed duration. Complex medical evidence, expert examinations, the number of parties, procedural disputes, court workload and appeals can all affect the duration.

​

Is there a fixed compensation amount for medical malpractice?

No. Compensation depends on the nature and extent of the damage, financial losses, medical evidence and other legally relevant circumstances.

​

How long do I have to file a medical malpractice claim?

There is no single deadline that applies to every case. The applicable period depends on the legal nature of the claim, the healthcare provider, the circumstances of the injury and other factors. Early legal review is therefore important.

​

What if the malpractice occurred in a Turkish public hospital?

A claim involving a public hospital can raise administrative-law issues and may follow a different procedure from a private healthcare dispute. The appropriate route and deadlines should be examined promptly.

​

Can I complain to the Ministry of Health?

Yes, patients may have access to patient-rights and health-service complaint mechanisms. The Ministry of Health's Patient Rights Department provides official information concerning these mechanisms.

​

Can I obtain my medical records?

Patients have rights concerning information about their health and treatment under Turkish patient-rights rules. If access becomes difficult, the circumstances can be reviewed with a lawyer.

​

Are medical records protected as personal data?

Yes. Health information is classified as special-category personal data under Turkish data-protection law. The Personal Data Protection Authority provides official information on its protection.

​

Can I settle a medical malpractice dispute without going to court?

Depending on the dispute and applicable procedural rules, negotiation or mediation may provide an alternative to full litigation. The suitability of settlement should be assessed after reviewing the evidence.

​

Should I post my medical records or complaint on social media?

It is generally prudent to be careful with public disclosure of medical information and accusations. Medical records contain sensitive personal data, and public statements can create additional legal or privacy issues.

​

Why Choose Kurucuk & Associates for a Medical Malpractice Matter?

Medical malpractice disputes can be emotionally difficult as well as legally and technically demanding.

​

A patient may be angry, worried about future treatment, uncertain about what happened or unsure whether the outcome was simply an unfortunate complication.

 

Our role is not to assume the answer before the evidence is examined.

 

At Kurucuk & Associates, we approach healthcare disputes by looking carefully at:

​

• the treatment history;

• the patient's medical records;

• the relationship between the parties;

• consent and information;

• the alleged professional error;

• causation;

• medical expert evidence;

• financial and non-material damage;

• limitation and procedural requirements; and

• the most appropriate legal route.

 

Where appropriate, that may mean negotiation or mediation rather than immediate litigation. In other cases, a compensation claim, administrative proceeding or criminal complaint may need to be pursued.

 

The strategy should follow the evidence.

​

Medical Malpractice Lawyer in Istanbul, Turkey

If you believe that you or a family member has suffered harm because of medical treatment in Istanbul, the first question is not simply whether the result was bad.

​

The more important questions are:

 

What happened? What should reasonably have happened? Was there a legally relevant fault? Did that fault cause the injury? Who may be responsible? And what remedy is available under Turkish law?

 

Those questions require careful examination of the medical and legal evidence.

 

Kurucuk & Associates assists clients in Istanbul and elsewhere in Turkey with medical malpractice and healthcare disputes, including compensation claims, patient-rights matters, negotiations, mediation, administrative proceedings and related criminal cases.

 

For official information concerning Turkish healthcare and patient rights, consult the Ministry of Health, its Patient Rights Department, the official Turkish legislation database, the Personal Data Protection Authority and, where relevant, the Council of Forensic Medicine.